Join us at Health Research Day — June 6th at Canton Waterfront Park, Baltimore!   Learn More →
← Back to all trials
Recruiting NCT07855354

Safety and Efficacy of Papillary Versus NonPapillary Access During Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

Conditions: Safety, Efficacy, Papillary, NonPapillary, Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

Sex: All
Ages: 18 Years – N/A
Healthy volunteers: No
Phase: NA
Enrollment: 70
Sponsor: Ain Shams University

Location: Ain Shams University Cairo

Summary

This study aims to evaluate and compare the safety, efficacy, and clinical outcomes of papillary and non-papillary renal access during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), and to determine whether non-papillary puncture can be considered a safe and effective alternative to the conventional papillary approach in selected patients.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria: * Age ≥ 18 years * Solitary or multiple renal calculi ≥2 cm * Ability to provide informed consent Exclusion Criteria: * Bleeding diathesis or uncorrected coagulopathy * Active urinary tract infection at the time of surgery * Congenital anomalies severely distorting renal anatomy (e.g., horseshoe kidney, ectopic kidney) * Morbid obesity \[body mass index (BMI) ≥ 40\] limiting safe positioning * Pregnancy

Interested in this study? View the official listing for contact and enrollment details.

View on ClinicalTrials.gov

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT07855354). StuddyBuddy aggregates publicly available trial information.