← Back to all trials
Recruiting
NCT07855354
Safety and Efficacy of Papillary Versus NonPapillary Access During Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
Conditions: Safety, Efficacy, Papillary, NonPapillary, Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
Sex: All
Ages: 18 Years – N/A
Healthy volunteers: No
Phase: NA
Enrollment: 70
Sponsor: Ain Shams University
Location: Ain Shams University Cairo
Summary
This study aims to evaluate and compare the safety, efficacy, and clinical outcomes of papillary and non-papillary renal access during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), and to determine whether non-papillary puncture can be considered a safe and effective alternative to the conventional papillary approach in selected patients.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
* Age ≥ 18 years
* Solitary or multiple renal calculi ≥2 cm
* Ability to provide informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
* Bleeding diathesis or uncorrected coagulopathy
* Active urinary tract infection at the time of surgery
* Congenital anomalies severely distorting renal anatomy (e.g., horseshoe kidney, ectopic kidney)
* Morbid obesity \[body mass index (BMI) ≥ 40\] limiting safe positioning
* Pregnancy
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT07855354). StuddyBuddy aggregates publicly available trial information.