← Back to all trials
Completed
NCT07752524
Comparison of TEP and eTEP Methods in Inguinal Hernia Repair
Conditions: Inguinal Hernia Repair (Not Urgent)
Sex: All
Healthy volunteers: No
Phase: NA
Enrollment: 75
Sponsor: Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital
Location: Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital Istanbul Ataşehir
Summary
In the advanced-looking e TEP method, dissection will be easier, the mesh will be laid more easily to cover potential hernia areas and the technique will contribute more positively to the learning curve. will provide.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
* Over 18 years of age and patients who agreed to a laparoscopic hernia repair,
* Unilateral inguinal hernia with fascia defect larger than 0.5 cm,
* EHS (European Hernia Society) ( Classification (Primary, lateral or medial, 1, 2 and 3)
* ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) 1-3 (not in need of intensive care)
Exclusion Criteria:
* Strangulated hernias
* Patients in whom laparoscopic operation is contraindicated,
* Patients who developed recurrence after TEP or eTEP,
* Patients with a history of previous open lower abdominal operation
* Patients who should not receive general anesthesia.
* ASA 3 patients in need of intensive care and ASA 4 patients
* Bilateral hernias.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT07752524). StuddyBuddy aggregates publicly available trial information.