Join us at Health Research Day — June 6th at Canton Waterfront Park, Baltimore!   Learn More →
← Back to all trials
Completed NCT07710950

Muscle Energy Technique Versus Myofascial Release in Chronic Non Specific Neck Pain

Conditions: Chronic Neck Pain, Mechanical Neck Pain

Sex: All
Ages: 18 Years – 45 Years
Healthy volunteers: Yes
Phase: NA
Enrollment: 44
Sponsor: University of Lahore

Location: University of Lahore Teaching Hospital, Lahore Lahore Punjab Province

Summary

Chronic non-specific neck pain is a common musculoskeletal condition that can significantly affect daily activities, sleep quality, and overall quality of life. It is often associated with muscle tightness, poor posture, and reduced neck mobility without any specific underlying structural pathology such as fracture or nerve compression. This study aims to compare two commonly used physiotherapy treatment techniques: Muscle Energy Technique (MET) and Myofascial Release Therapy (MFR) in individuals with chronic non-specific neck pain. A total of 52 participants aged 18-45 years with neck pain lasting more than three months will be included in this randomized controlled trial. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: Group A: Conventional physiotherapy plus Muscle Energy Technique Group B: Conventional physiotherapy plus Myofascial Release Therapy Both groups will receive treatment twice weekly for four weeks . Conventional physiotherapy will include moist heat application and stretching exercises for neck muscles. In addition, one group will receive Muscle Energy Technique targeting the upper trapezius, levator scapulae, and scalene muscles, while the other group will receive Myofascial Release Therapy targeting the same muscle groups. Outcome measures will be assessed at baseline, at the second week, and at the fourth week. The study will evaluate: Pain intensity (Numeric Pain Rating Scale) Neck range of motion (Inclinometer) Sleep quality (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index) Neck-related disability (Neck Disability Index) The results of this study may help determine which technique is more effective in reducing pain, improving movement, enhancing sleep quality, and reducing disability in individuals with chronic non-specific neck pain. This may support clinicians in selecting the most appropriate treatment approach.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria: * Both gender * Participant with neck pain from the past 3 months. * Participant with neck pain ≥7 on Visual analogue scale. * Participant with unilateral tightness of upper trapezius, scalene and levator scapulae on manual palpation. * Diagnosis consistent with Non-Specific Neck Pain (NSNP): mechanical pain aggravated by posture or movement, no neurological signs, no red flags, and pain localized to the neck with referral not extending below the shoulder. * Positive Craniocervical Flexion Test (CCFT) indicating deep cervical flexor dysfunction. Exclusion Criteria: * Participant who received any therapeutic intervention for neck pain. * Participate with any inflammatory, neurological or malignant condition like rheumatoid arthritis, cervical radiculopathy or tumor of the neck respectively. * Participant with associated neck pain with facial pain or headache as a result of any fracture or major trauma to the cervical spine. * Participant with the history of surgery of cervical spine in the last 12 months. * Participant with disc prolapse or stenosis. * Participant with any deformity such as torticollis, sprengel's deformity or scoliosis.

Interested in this study? View the official listing for contact and enrollment details.

View on ClinicalTrials.gov

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT07710950). StuddyBuddy aggregates publicly available trial information.