← Back to all trials
Not Yet Recruiting
NCT07674030
Functional and Aesthetic Comparison of Surgical Nasal Reconstruction Versus Nasal Prosthesis (Epithesis) After Total or Subtotal Nasal Amputation
Conditions: Nose Cancer, Rhinectomy
Sex: All
Ages: 18 Years – N/A
Healthy volunteers: No
Enrollment: 20
Sponsor: Hôpital NOVO
Location: CHU de Caen Caen
Summary
CERNAS is a prospective, multicenter, non-interventional study comparing the functional and aesthetic outcomes of two rehabilitation strategies after total or subtotal nasal amputation: surgical reconstruction (primarily paramedian forehead flap or free flap) versus nasal epithesis (prosthesis). Patients who have undergone either rehabilitation at least one year prior to enrolment will be invited to complete the validated French version of the SCHNOS (Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey) questionnaire. The study aims to provide an objective, patient-reported comparison of these two options to guide future clinical decision-making.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
* Patients aged 18 years or older
* Patients who have undergone total or subtotal nasal amputation (defined as loss of at least three nasal subunits, or of two subunits including the dorsum) and who have been rehabilitated either by surgical reconstruction or by nasal epithesis for more than one year
Exclusion Criteria:
* Ongoing tumour progression or tumour recurrence
* Non-French-speaking patients
* Patients under legal protection measures (guardianship, legal safeguarding, limited or full legal incapacity)
* Patients unlikely to cooperate with the study (e.g. presenting with a psychiatric disorder)
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT07674030). StuddyBuddy aggregates publicly available trial information.