← Back to all trials
Recruiting
NCT07656285
Comparison of Immediate Changes in Cervical Range of Motion Following Cervical Extension and Downslip Mobilizations.
Conditions: Cervical Disease
Sex: All
Ages: 18 Years – 45 Years
Healthy volunteers: Yes
Phase: NA
Enrollment: 128
Sponsor: Missouri State University
Location: Missouri State University - Physical Therapy Clinic Springfield Missouri
Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy seated cervical extension glides vs supine downslip glides, on both cervical rotation range of motion and patient comfort. Information gathered from this study may be used to help clinicians determine the most beneficial methods of cervical mobilizations as a rehabilitation tool.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
* healthy individuals
* 18-45 years of age.
Exclusion Criteria:
* current or previous history of neck pain;
* cervical spine instability;
* history of cervical spine surgery;
* neurological issues;
* contraindications to mobilization including fractures, coagulation issues, and osteoporosis
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT07656285). StuddyBuddy aggregates publicly available trial information.
