Join us at Health Research Day — June 6th at Canton Waterfront Park, Baltimore!   Learn More →
← Back to all trials
Completed NCT07633977

Comparison of Cosmetic Outcome and Patient Satisfaction Between Staples and Suture Technique for Wound Closure Following Upper Limb Surgeries

Conditions: Wound Closure Technique, Wound Dehiscence, Surgical

Sex: All
Ages: 18 Years – N/A
Healthy volunteers: No
Phase: NA
Enrollment: 80
Sponsor: Kathmandu University School of Medical Sciences

Location: Dhulikhel Hospital, Kathmandu University Hospital Dhulikhel Bagmati

Summary

Surgical wound closure is an essential component of postoperative care that influences wound healing, infection rates, cosmetic appearance, and patient satisfaction. Sutures are conventionally used for skin closure following orthopedic procedures; however, surgical staples have gained popularity because of their rapid application, secure fixation, and potentially superior cosmetic outcomes. Despite their widespread use, there remains limited evidence comparing cosmetic outcomes and patient satisfaction between staple and suture techniques in upper limb surgeries in the local setting. This study aims to compare the cosmetic outcome and patient satisfaction between staples and sutures for wound closure following upper limb surgeries at Dhulikhel Hospital. Secondary objectives include comparing wound infection rates and duration of hospital stay between the two techniques. A prospective comparative study is conducted among adult patients undergoing upper limb surgeries. Patients fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria are recruited consecutively during the study period. Following completion of surgery, wound closure is performed either with interrupted sutures or surgical staples according to the operative plan. Wounds are to be evaluated on postoperative day 2, day 7, and day 14, with further follow-up at 30 days and 6 weeks. Cosmetic outcome and patient satisfaction are assessed using a 5-point Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Pain assessment, wound complications including infection, and duration of hospital stay are also documented and compared between the two groups. The findings of this study can help identify the optimal skin closure method for upper limb surgeries and contribute to improved postoperative outcomes and patient satisfaction. HYPOTHESES OF THE STUDY Null hypothesis (Ho): there is no difference in cosmetic outcome and patient satisfaction between sutures and staple technique for wound closure following upper limb surgeries. Alternative hypothesis (H1): there is difference in cosmetic outcome and patient satisfaction between sutures and staple technique for wound closure following upper limb surgeries Hence, Ho : (Cosmetic and Patient satisfaction score) in Suture group = Cosmetic and Patient satisfaction score) in Staples group H1 : (Cosmetic and Patient satisfaction score) in Suture group ≠ (Cosmetic and Patient satisfaction score) in Staples group

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria: * Adult patient (\> 18 years and above) * Any wound more than two centimeters in length * All closed fracture of upper limb requiring open reduction and internal fixations * All implant removal and benign tumor excision of upper limb Exclusion Criteria: * Open upper limb fracture * Known metal allergy(nickel, titanium) * Active infection * Malignant tumor excision * Tendon repair * Closed Reduction Percutaneous Pinning

Interested in this study? View the official listing for contact and enrollment details.

View on ClinicalTrials.gov

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT07633977). StuddyBuddy aggregates publicly available trial information.