Hypofractionated vs Conventional RT After Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction

This study investigates the safety and efficacy of hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) versus conventional fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT) in breast cancer patients undergoing total mastectomy with prosthetic reconstruction. Study Design Population: Patients with high-risk breast cancer after mastectomy and immediate implant reconstruction. Intervention: HFRT Arm: 43.5 Gy in 15 fractions (2.9 Gy/fraction, 3 weeks). Control Arm: CFRT (50 Gy in 25 fractions, 2 Gy/fraction, 5 weeks). Endpoints Primary: Reconstruction failure rate (e.g., implant removal, capsular contracture)

Inclusion Criteria: * Female, aged 18-75 years * Karnofsky Performance Status ≥60 * Histopathologically confirmed invasive breast adenocarcinoma * Total mastectomy \[with or without nipple-areolar complex preservation\] + axillary dissection/sentinel lymph node biopsy + implant/expander placement R0 resection with negative margins * pT3 or N2-3 disease; or pT1-2N1 * No distant metastasis * Completed standard neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy cycles * ≤8 weeks post-chemotherapy or ≤12 weeks post-surgery if no chemotherapy * Signed informed consent Exclusion Criteria: * Prior radiotherapy to chest wall or nodal regions * Pregnancy or lactation * T4 stage disease * Autologous breast reconstruction of the irradiated breast * Pre-radiotherapy local/regional/distant metastasis * Grade ≥3 implant-related adverse events irreversible before radiotherapy * Bilateral breast cancer requiring bilateral radiotherapy * Concurrent/secondary malignancy with disease-free interval \