← Back to all trials
Recruiting
NCT05721690
UED-A Videolaryngoscope vs. Glidescope Titanium for Elective Tracheal Intubation
Conditions: Intubation; Difficult or Failed
Sex: All
Ages: 18 Years – N/A
Phase: NA
Enrollment: 60
Sponsor: Campus Bio-Medico University
Location: Italy
Summary
The present randomized clinical trial wants to compare the efficacy and safety of UED-A videolaryngoscope to Glidescope Titanium for routinely tracheal intubation in 60 adults, in terms of successful rate, no.
attempts and manoeuvre duration.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:Patients candidates for general anesthesia in elective surgeryAge over 18 yearsAmerican Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III.Exclusion Criteria:Refusal to sign informed consentPaediatric populationASA physical status IVEmergency tracheal intubationIndependent Predictors of difficult Videolaryngoscopy (Neck extension < 80°, macroglossia, interincisor distance < 3 cm, anatomical alterations of the neck, cardiac surgery, ear-nose-throat surgery)
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05721690). StuddyBuddy aggregates publicly available trial information.
