Join us at Health Research Day — June 6th at Canton Waterfront Park, Baltimore!   Learn More →
← Back to all trials
Recruiting NCT05698446

Comparison of MBR + Suture Tape and Anatomic Reconstruction for CLAI in GJL Cases: A Prospective Cohort Study

Conditions: Ankle Sprains, Hypermobility Syndrome

Sex: All
Ages: 18 Years – 60 Years
Enrollment: 86
Sponsor: Peking University Third Hospital

Location: China

Summary

GJL is a risk factor for postoperative recurrent instability following an MBR for CLAI. BPR with suture tape augmentation and anatomic reconstruction may provide more strength and stability. However, BPR with suture tape augmentation may lead to rejection of the suture tape, while anatomic reconstruction may be associated with more trauma. In addition, the outcomes between the BPR with suture tape augmentation and anatomic reconstruction were unknown.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:Clinical diagnosis of lateral ankle pain and instability Beighton score ≥4 Age with 18 to 60 yearsExclusion Criteria:Patients with an acute or subacute ankle injury (within 3 months) Injury of the deltoid ligament Alignment of lower extremity greater than 5 degrees Fractures of the lower extremity Stage III or IV osteoarthritis Patients who refused to participate in the study

Interested in this study? View the official listing for contact and enrollment details.

View on ClinicalTrials.gov

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05698446). StuddyBuddy aggregates publicly available trial information.