← Back to all trials
Recruiting
NCT05698446
Comparison of MBR + Suture Tape and Anatomic Reconstruction for CLAI in GJL Cases: A Prospective Cohort Study
Conditions: Ankle Sprains, Hypermobility Syndrome
Sex: All
Ages: 18 Years – 60 Years
Enrollment: 86
Sponsor: Peking University Third Hospital
Location: China
Summary
GJL is a risk factor for postoperative recurrent instability following an MBR for CLAI.
BPR with suture tape augmentation and anatomic reconstruction may provide more strength and stability.
However, BPR with suture tape augmentation may lead to rejection of the suture tape, while anatomic reconstruction may be associated with more trauma.
In addition, the outcomes between the BPR with suture tape augmentation and anatomic reconstruction were unknown.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:Clinical diagnosis of lateral ankle pain and instability Beighton score ≥4 Age with 18 to 60 yearsExclusion Criteria:Patients with an acute or subacute ankle injury (within 3 months) Injury of the deltoid ligament Alignment of lower extremity greater than 5 degrees Fractures of the lower extremity Stage III or IV osteoarthritis Patients who refused to participate in the study
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05698446). StuddyBuddy aggregates publicly available trial information.