← Back to all trials
Completed
NCT05697341
Ultra Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy VS Stented Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Stone Management
Conditions: Renal Stone
Sex: All
Ages: 18 Years – 60 Years
Phase: NA
Enrollment: 90
Sponsor: Ain Shams University
Location: Egypt
Summary
Nephrolithiasis is the third most common disease of the urinary tract.
As minimally invasive technologies develop, shock wave lithotripsy (SWL), retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS), and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) are different surgeries to treat renal stones.Aim of the Study is to compare results, safety and outcome of Ultra mini PCNL versus stented extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) for the management of renal calculi from 10 - 20 mm.
Patients were randomized to either Ultra-Mini-Percutaneous nephrolithotomy group or stented SWL group via the closed envelope method.
Patient data was collected preoperatively, immediately postoperatively and 2 and 4 weeks postoperatively to assess operative time, hospital stay, complications regarding fever, hematuria and need for blood transfusion, residual stones and need for retreatment.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:patients between 18 and 60 yearscomplaining of radioopaque renal stones ranging from 10-20 mm.BMI not exceeding 40Exclusion Criteria:radiolucent stones,smaller than 10 mm or larger than 20 mm stonescongenital renal anomalies or spinal deformityBMI exceeding 40.Patients with uncorrected bleeding diathesispregnant femalesuntreated UTI.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05697341). StuddyBuddy aggregates publicly available trial information.
