Differences Between Two Type Implants in Post-extraction Alveolus

One of the challenges of current implantology involves the preservation or reduction of existing bone resorption, mainly in the buccal bone plate, after tooth loss, which becomes of special importance in the anterior region of the maxilla (aesthetic region). The study evaluates the macroscopic shape of neck implant influence in the results of immediate implants, in a population comprised of individuals from the clinic of the Faculty of Dental Medicine of the University of Porto in need of replacement of a single tooth. It is intended to evaluate the morphometric (direct measures and plaster models measurements), imaging, and photographic characteristics of the V3 implant in comparison with the C1 implant of Mis® by an evaluation period of 6 months when placing an immediate implant.

Inclusion Criteria:Patients aged 18 and overPatients with understanding and free decision-making for informed consentPatients who need rehabilitation of a tooth in the region of incisors, canines, or maxillary premolarsPatients with EDS-1 or EDS-2 dental sockets, according to Caplanis N. classification.Exclusion Criteria:Patients with systemic pathologies that contraindicate the surgical procedure;Prolonged Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs);Bisphosphonate therapy;Lack of opposing teeth on implant site;Lack of adjacent teeth on implant site;Dental-sockets with total loss of one of the cortical;Untreated periodontal pathology;Pathology or circumstance that prevents patients from attending routine check-ups;Patients who smoke more than 10 cigarettes/day. Smokers are advised to reduce or stop smoking.