Comparison Between Manta and Prostar Closure Devices | Clinical Trial | StuddyBuddy@endsection Comparison Between Manta and Prostar Closure Devices
Join us at Health Research Day — June 6th at Canton Waterfront Park, Baltimore!   Learn More →
← Back to all trials
Completed NCT05662748

Comparison Between Manta and Prostar Closure Devices

Conditions: Aortic Valve Stenosis

Sex: All
Ages: 18 Years – N/A
Enrollment: 250
Sponsor: RWTH Aachen University

Location: Germany

Summary

Use of the closure device in patient with percutaneous transfemoral aortic valve replacement

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:Patient scheduled for treatment with the TAVR device 2. Decision to use the Manta or the Prostar closure device on a clinical base by the treating physician 3. Signed informed consentExclusion Criteria:Male or female aged < 18 2. Pregnant and lactating females 3. Patient has been committed to an institution by legal or regulatory order

Interested in this study? View the official listing for contact and enrollment details.

View on ClinicalTrials.gov

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05662748). StuddyBuddy aggregates publicly available trial information.