Join us at Health Research Day — June 6th at Canton Waterfront Park, Baltimore!   Learn More →
← Back to all trials
Completed NCT05604703

Comparison of Two Different Periodontal Classification

Conditions: Periodontal Diseases

Sex: All
Ages: 18 Years – 99 Years
Healthy volunteers: 1
Enrollment: 300
Sponsor: Kutahya Health Sciences University

Location: Turkey

Summary

Due to some deficiencies in the classification defined by Armitage in 1999, a new periodontal classification was published in 2018. New periodontitis A staging and grading system was used for classification. Staging depends largely on the severity of the disease, while grading is based on the rate of disease progression to the past. It provides additional information on a risk-based analysis and assessment of risk.The aim of this study is to reveal the differences between the old periodontal classification and the new periodontal disease classification published in 2018. Periodontitis in the literature review. The two classifications were compared in patients. However, a study on gingival recession not done. Anamnesis, routine periodontal indices, routine radiographs of 300 patients, first of all According to the 1999 Periodontal Disease Classification, after it will be classified according to the New Periodontal Disease Classification developed in 2018. Thus, two different Periodontal Disease Classifications, old and new, comparison will be made.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:be over 18 years oldPatients with recorded periodontal indices and radiographsPatients without disease affecting bone metabolismExclusion Criteria:Mentally retarded patientsPregnant and breastfeeding patientsPatients receiving radiotherapyPatients who do not use drugs that impair bone metabolism such as bisphosphonates

Interested in this study? View the official listing for contact and enrollment details.

View on ClinicalTrials.gov

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05604703). StuddyBuddy aggregates publicly available trial information.