← Back to all trials
Enrolling By Invitation
NCT05604625
Ethically Accepted With Code 851/2971 A Comparison of Class Ⅱ Malocclusion Treatment Using Van Beek-headgear Activator Versus Andresen Activator
Conditions: Class II Growth Modification
Sex: All
Ages: 8 Years – 13 Years
Healthy volunteers: 1
Phase: NA
Enrollment: 24
Sponsor: Al-Azhar University
Location: Egypt
Summary
The aim of this study is to compare the treatment results when treating Class II division 1 malocclusion using the Van Beek-Headgear Activator combination (vBHGA) appliance versus using the Andresen activator.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:Class II division 1 indicated by ANB angle value ≥ 4ºClass II division 1 with overjet > 5mm.An age range between 8 and 13 years growing patient using cervical vertebral stage assessment (CVS).No previous orthodontic treatmentNo indications or symptoms of periodontal disease in the past or present, as determined by clinical and radiographic examinationExclusion Criteria:Missing teeth (excluding 3rd molars).Craniofacial anomalies.Medical condition or prescription medication that may affect growth.Lack of compliance whenever documented in the charts.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05604625). StuddyBuddy aggregates publicly available trial information.
